Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 53297

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2023 | Month : July | Volume : 17 | Issue : 7 | Page : UD01 - UD02 Full Version

Graded Epidural Anaesthesia with Low-Dose Phenylephrine Infusion for Management of Caesarean Section Complicated with Severe Mitral Stenosis: A Case Report


Published: July 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/60584.18234
Kritika Yadav, Bonchanpalli Mohan Kumar, Shirin Parveen

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Era’s Lucknow Medical College and Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2. Junior Resident, Department of Anaesthesia, Era’s Lucknow Medical College and Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Era’s Lucknow Medical College and Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Kritika Yadav,
Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Era’s Lucknow Medical College and Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: kirtikayadav04@gmail.com

Abstract

A pregnant patient with a heart condition poses a unique challenge for the obstetrician and anaesthesiologist. Understanding the physiology of pregnancy and the pathophysiology of primary heart disease is important when providing anaesthesia for these high-risk patients during childbirth. A 32-year-old primigravida at 35 weeks and two days of gestation was diagnosed with Rheumatic Heart Disease (RHD), severe Mitral Stenosis (MS), moderate Mitral Regurgitation (MR), mild Atrial Regurgitation (AR), moderate Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR), Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH), Atrial Fibrillation (AF), and Grade-II New York Heart Association (NYHA). The patient underwent an Elective Lower Segment Cesarean Section (LSCS) performed under epidural anaesthesia, and complications were satisfactorily managed.

Keywords

Anaesthetists, Caesarean section, Obstetricians, Pregnancy, Rheumatic heart disease

Case Report

A 32-year-old primigravida was diagnosed with RHD during the second trimester of pregnancy when she developed breathlessness while performing daily activities and developed pulmonary oedema. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed a Mitral Valve Area (MVA) of 1 cm2 with severe PAH and a normal ejection fraction (60%). She also developed AF secondary to MS and was on rate control (tablet Metoprolol 25 mg twice a day) and subcutaneous injection of Enoxaparin 0.4 mg once a day. Her pulmonary oedema resolved with diuretics.

Later, she was scheduled for an elective LSCS at 35 weeks and two days of gestation. Physical examination revealed an irregularly irregular pulse of 133 beats per minute and a Blood Pressure (BP) of 96/64 mm Hg in the right arm while in the supine position. The first and second heart sounds were audible with the presence of a diastolic murmur. Bilateral vesicular breath sounds were heard with no additional sounds. All laboratory investigations, including serum electrolytes, were within normal limits.

The patient was classified as American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Grade-IV and provided with written and informed high-risk consent. She was advised to be nil per oral for six hours prior to surgery and skip the injection of Enoxaparin 12 hours before the procedure.

Pre-anesthetic assessment was conducted, and the patient was taken to the operation theatre. All monitors were attached following ASA standards, and two large-bore intravenous catheters were secured. Under aseptic precautions, a 20G cannula was inserted in the right radial artery for intra-arterial BP monitoring.

Using strict aseptic precautions, an 18G Tuohy’s needle was placed in the L2-L3 space using the loss of resistance technique, and an epidural catheter was threaded and secured at 9 cm. Incremental doses of 2 mL of 0.5% Bupivacaine were administered until an adequate sensory block up to the T6 dermatome was achieved. A total dose of 12 mL was given over 20 minutes. A very low dose infusion of Phenylephrine at 10 mcg/min was started and titrated to maintain BP within 20% of the baseline value. The surgery was performed without complications, and the baby had APGAR scores of six and eight at one and five minutes, respectively. Intravenous fluids were administered judiciously, and an infusion of Oxytocin at 10 IU/hr was started after delivery. Intraoperatively, there was approximately 400 mL of blood loss, and urine output was 250 mL. The patient received oxygen supplementation throughout the surgery.

The intraoperative course was uneventful, and she was transferred to the cardiac careunit for further postoperative monitoring. Her postoperative vitals were as follows: BP- 100/62 mm Hg, pulse- 104 beats per minute, respiratory rate- 22/min, SpO2- 100% on a face mask at 5 liters per minute. The infusion of Phenylephrine was gradually tapered off. Postoperative analgesia was managed with an epidural top-up of 0.125% Bupivacaine and intravenous paracetamol. Her hospital stay was uneventful.

Discussion

Cardiovascular disease affects 1% to 3% of all pregnancies and accounts for 10% to 15% of maternal mortality (1). RHD is the most common condition responsible for maternal cardiac complications (2). During pregnancy, there are normal physiological changes such as an increase in intravascular volume and cardiac output (CO), and a decrease in systemic vascular resistance (SVR) (3). Uterine contraction and involution further lead to auto transfusion and increased CO (4). Stenotic lesions, where the CO is fixed against the stenosed valve, are poorly tolerated and often worsen during pregnancy (5). Since no anesthesia technique is considered entirely freefrom adverse effects, it is crucial to individualise each case by weighing the benefits against the risks.

In developing countries, cardiovascular diseases often go undiagnosed until they manifest symptoms due to a lack of antenatal checkups. Pregnancy-associated physiological changes in the cardiovascular system, such as an increase in heart rate, plasma volume, CO, and a reduction in SVR, impose an additional burden on an already diseased heart (3). In this case, the patient was diagnosed with RHD only after developing breathlessness, palpitations due to pulmonary edema, and AF secondary to a stenotic mitral valve.

Despite technological advances, cardiovascular complications during pregnancy remain one of the leading causes of maternal mortality and morbidity (6). Therefore, the approach and management should be meticulously planned. In this case, the patient had severe MS (valve area 1 cm2) with severe PAH, AF, and Grade-II NYHA, and was scheduled for elective LSCS. The goals for anesthetic management of this patient were to prevent rapid ventricular rate, avoid excessive or rapid decrease in SVR, prevent overloading of central blood volume while maintaining left atrial (LA) preload, avoid hypoxia, hypercarbia, and acidosis (which can further worsen pulmonary arterial pressures and precipitate right ventricular failure), avoid aortocaval compression, and provide analgesia.

General anaesthesia (GA) has been a preferred choice for managing LSCS in patients with severe stenotic valvular lesions, but it is associated with complications such as difficult or failed intubation, risk of aspiration of gastric contents, and increased blood loss. To minimise the tocolytic and fetal effects of inhalation agents, they are often used in reduced concentrations, which increases the risk of intraoperative awareness (7). Positive pressure ventilation and the use of nitrous oxide can increase pulmonary vascular resistance and worsen PAH (8). Additionally, the use of opioids is associated with a risk of neonatal respiratory depression. However, GA is necessary for critically ill parturients requiring mechanical ventilation, unstable AF, or in patients at risk of hemodynamic complications.

The benefits of Regional Anesthesia (RA) for LSCS over GA have been well proven in studies [9,10]. RA allows the mother to be awake during the birth of her child, avoids airway handling, preserves protective airway reflexes, and minimises the adverse effects of induction and inhalational agents. However, due to the risk of hemodynamic alterations, reduced afterload, and hypotension associated with subarachnoid block, it was not the technique of choice in this case.

Epidural anesthesia, with its slower and gradual onset, has the least impact on hemodynamics, prevents cardiovascular decompensation, and improves utero-placental perfusion. The duration of epidural block can be extended into the postoperative period, providing postoperative analgesia as well. Since this patient was scheduled for elective cesarean section, we opted for a gradual incremental epidural block for better maternal and fetal outcomes.

It is noteworthy that low-dose infusion of phenylephrine has been found to be superior in preventing hypotension following a neuraxial block compared to bolus doses (11). In this case, a prophylactic baseline low-dose infusion of phenylephrine at 10 mcg/min was started and titrated to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) within 20% of the baseline value.

Intravenous fluids were judiciously administered to prevent fluid overload and pulmonary edema. Once the baby was delivered, an oxytocin infusion was started at 10 U/hr. Injection Esmolol was kept readily available to manage any post-delivery tachycardia with oxytocin infusion, but it was not needed. Epidural analgesia was provided for postoperative pain, and the patient’s recovery was uneventful. We should remain highly vigilant for complications such as uterine autotransfusion during the postpartum period. The case was successfully managed with graded epidural block combined with phenylephrine infusion, minimising invasive procedures and systemic drug administration.

Conclusion

Graded epidural anesthesia with low-dose phenylephrine infusion provides stable hemodynamics in patients with severe MS. Therefore, it can be used to manage LSCS in parturients with severe MS, resulting in good maternal and fetal outcomes.

References

1.
Ramlakhan KP, Johnson MR, Roos-Hesselink JW. Pregnancy and cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17(11):718-31. Doi: 10.1038/s41569-020- 0390-z, PMID 32518358. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Anthony J, Osman A, Sani MU. Valvular heart disease in pregnancy. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2016;27(2):111-18. Doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2016-052, PMID 27213859, PMCID PMC4928166. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Soma-Pillay P, Nelson-Piercy C, Tolppanen H, Mebazaa A. Physiological changes in pregnancy. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2016;27(2):89-94. Doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2016- 021, PMID 27213856. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Abbas AE, Lester SJ, Connolly H. Pregnancy and the cardiovascular system. Int J Cardiol. 2005;98(2):179-89. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.10.028, PMID 15686766. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Tsiaras S, Poppas A. Mitral valve disease in pregnancy: Outcomes and management. Obstet Med. 2009;2(1):06-10. Doi: 10.1258/om.2008.080002, PMID 27582798. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Ouyang P, Sharma G. The potential for pregnancy heart teams to reduce maternal mortality in women with cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(18):2114-16. Doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.007, PMID 33121719. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Robins K, Lyons G. Intraoperative awareness during general anaesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anaesth Analg. 2009;109(3):886-90. Doi: 10.1213/ ane.0b013e3181af83c1, PMID 19690262. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Sarkar MS, Desai PM. Pulmonary hypertension and cardiac anaesthesia: Anaesthesiologist’s perspective. Ann Card Anaesth. 2018;21(2):116-22. Doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_123_17, PMID 29652270, PMCID PMC5914209.
9.
Iddrisu M, Khan ZH. Anaesthesia for cesarean delivery: General or regional anaesthesia-a systematic review. Ain-Shams J Anaesthesiol. 2021;13(1):01-07. Doi: 10.1186/s42077-020-00121-7. [crossref]
10.
Chohan U, Afshan G, Mone A. Anaesthesia for caesarean section in patients with cardiac disease. J Pak Med Assoc [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2023 Mar 2];56(1):32- 38. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16454133/.
11.
Choudhary M, Bajaj JK. Study comparing phenylephrine bolus and infusion for maternal hypotension and neonatal outcome during cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Anaesth Essays Res. 2018;12(2):446-51. Doi: 10.4103/aer. AER_23_18, PMID 29962614.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/60584.18234

Date of Submission: Oct 04, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Nov 14, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Apr 29, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 06, 2022
• Manual Googling: Mar 09, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Apr 19, 2023 (3%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com